God’s
Presence with
the Confederate States
A SERMON
CHRIST
CHURCH, SAVANNAH,
ON THURSDAY, THE 13th
JUNE.
BEING
THE DAY APPOINTED
AT
THE REQUEST OF CONGRESS,
BY THE
President
of the Confederate
States,
AS A DAY OF
Solemn
Humiliation, Fasting and Prayer.
BY THE
RT. REV. STEPHEN
ELLIOTT.
RECTOR
OF CHRIST CHURCH.
Rt. Rev. Stephen Elliott (1806--1866) was an accomplished figure in the antebellum Episcopal Church,
being ordained as a priest in 1836, and
holding the office of Bishop of the Diocese of Georgia, beginning in
1840. He became rector of St. John's Church in Savannah, and later was
active in the establishment of the University of the South, in Sewanee,
Tennessee. After secession, he became Presiding Bishop of the
Episcopal Church in the Confederacy, and delivered the funerary oration
for Confederate Lt. Gen. Leonidas Polk, former Bishop of Louisiana, who
was killed in the Atlanta Campaign. This sermon was delivered in response to a call from Confederate President Jefferson Davis on May 28, 1861, for a day of "fasting and prayer," to be held on June 13th. After the war, although he had been a fervant supporter of the Confederate effort (and a firm believer in the institution of slavery), Elliott was instrumental, together with his friend, John Henry Hopkins, Bishop of Vermont, in re-uniting the two branches of the Episcopal Church. Elliott died on December 21st, 1866, in Savannah. I learned of this sermon from the book Gospel of Disunion, by Mitchell Snay (UNC Press, 1993). The full text was found on the Internet Archive. Elliott was prolific in publishing his sermons, so others may shortly appear here. |
|
Psalms
115: 1, 2, 3. Not
unto us, Lord, not unto us, but unto thy name give
glory,
The
devout
Proclamation of our President invites us to give, to-day, a public
manifestation of our gratitude for the clear proofs of the Divine
blessing
hitherto extended to the people of the Confederate States in their
efforts to
maintain and perpetuate public liberty, individual rights and national
independence. At the same time it calls
upon us to humble ourselves
before God in this our time of peril and difficulty, to recognize His
righteous
government, to acknowledge His goodness in times past, and to
supplicate His
merciful protection for the future. It
is a day to be devoted to mingled gratitude and humiliation—to
thanksgiving for
great mercies and to a confession of our unworthiness of them—to
acknowledgment
that unto Him alone belongs the glory of our present condition, and to
supplication that he will continue to be our shield and strong tower of
defence. This direction which the
Proclamation of our
Chief Magistrate has given to the devotions of the day will require a
review of
our civil affairs from the commencement of our constitutional struggle,
in order
to point out to you the overruling and directing hand of God in all our
movements. May His Holy Spirit rest upon
me and preserve my pen from bitterness and my tongue from evil
speaking, and
may that same Spirit enlighten your minds to perceive His presence in
all that
is past, and sanctify your hearts to keep it there through all that is
before
us. For
many years past, God has
permitted us, as a people, to be deeply humiliated.
While we have enjoyed great material
prosperity and have, in a certain sense, maintained our position under
the
forms of the Constitution, we have been systematically slandered and
traduced,
in public and in private, at home and abroad, in a way such as no free
and independent
people has ever before so quietly submitted to. Because
of the maintenance of an institution inherited from our fathers,
which the rest of the world was pleased to consider as incompatible
with
civilization and with Christianity, we have been made, thro’ every form
of
literature, a by-word among the nations of the earth.
The lecture room, the forum, the senate
chamber, the pulpit, have all been used as the instruments of our
denunciation. The newspapers of the
Northern States and of
Europe have vied to express their abhorrence of our social life and
their
contempt for ourselves. The grave
statesman,
the flippant poet, the sentimental novelist, the critical reviewer, the
witty
satirist, has each, in turn, singled out our homes as the targets of
his
falsehood, and our mothers, and wives, and daughters, as the objects of
his
insult. In many of the religious bodies of
the United States, their communicants from the slaveholding States were
excluded from the participation of the sacrament of the Lord's Supper,
and the
Southern ministers from brotherly interchange of services.
We had committed an unpardonable sin in doing
what Abraham, the friend of God, had done, what Philemon, the clearly
beloved
fellow laborer of Paul the aged, had not been ashamed to do. All this abuse and misrepresentation was
borne according to the temper of men, by some with the patience of
Christians, leaving
their justification in the hands of God, by others with contempt for an
hypocrisy which could see the mote in a brother's eye, but not the beam
in its
own eye; by not a few with arrogant defiance and words of bitter scorn. So far it had been a war of ideas, but
leaving, nevertheless, rankling wounds behind. Gradually
it passed from literature to politics, and we were soon made
aware that a deep laid scheme, resting upon the double basis of
fanaticism and interest,
was closing in upon us, which was to reduce to overt acts the ideas
which had
been so assiduously impressed not only upon the minds but upon the
feelings of
a whole generation. We were to be
humbled, not simply by being held up to the scorn of the noble and
generous all
the world over, but by being virtually disfranchised, even while
retaining the
forms of constitutional liberty, and being permitted to keep up the
appearances
of equality. This scheme was devised by
a far-seeing statesman, now occupying a position of commanding
influence, who
laid his plans with consummate skill and has pursued them, lor twenty
years,
with undeviating firmness, thro’ good report and thro’ evil report. He advanced from point to point with the
steady pace of inevitable destiny, drawing his lines closer and closer
around his
fluttering yet unresisting victim. He
educated through the Press and through the Pulpit, a whole generation,
and the
two ideas which he has made the ideas of the times, are the
irrepressible
conflict, under democratic institutions, between freedom and slavery,
and the
utter inability of slavery to maintain itself in the face of freedom. The one idea combined into a great party the
fanatic, the laborer, the foreigner, the farmer, the manufacturer—the
other
idea gave confidence and fearlessness to his followers.
When this powerful and ever growing host was
thoroughly prepared for its work, he decided, after a calm survey of
all the chances
of the conflict which he was about to inaugurate, that success was
inevitable. He perceived that there was
but one movement
that could defeat his plans— a dissolution of the Union—and he
maintained that
to be an impossibility. He believed that
party divisions could keep the South so distracted—could separate her
statesmen
by such lines of bitterness—that no combined resistance to his sure but
stealthy
advances, could ever be brought about. Had
all his followers been as prudent as himself, and had not God been on
our side,
nothing could have saved us from slow but inevitable destruction, for
it was
not his purpose to strike any blow that might alarm or arouse the
south, but to
achieve all his purposes thro’ seemingly constitutional movements. He well knew that the rapid growth of free
territory, filling up with a foreign population of the most radical
description,
would surely give him what he aimed at, and that gradual changes in the
Constitution
or plausible interpretations of it would cover all his advances with
the forms of
law, and render any opposition difficult which proceeded beyond the
limits of
legislative or judicial resistance, of which he had no fear. And then he looked upon the section he was
devoting
to ruin and perceived that she was engaged in a fierce Presidential
strife even
while he was closing his toils around her, well might he have supposed
that his
game was a sure one and that time only was needed to make his triumph
complete. At this moment, in the
confidence of his
heart, he might well have asked “Where is now their God?” and our
answer could
only have been “Our God is in the Heavens; he hath done whatsoever he
pleased.” But just at that moment, when he
considered
us deserted and doomed, commenced a series of events which has brought
us this
day to the altar of the living God to ascribe the glory of our
deliverance not
to ourselves but to Him, to confess our unworthiness of all this
unmerited
goodness and to pray him to continue to bless the work which he has
thus far so
graciously favored—"Not unto us, Lord, not unto us, but unto thy name
give
glory, for thy mercy and for thy truth's sake.” By
that mercy of God our greatest
difficulties have been successfully passed through, I do not say our
greatest
privations or our keenest sufferings. We
may yet have before us years of self-denial and of self-discipline—we
may be called
to suffer in our fortunes and in our homes—our chambers may be clothed
in
mourning and our hearts may be lacerated with sorrow, and yet, with all
this it
may be true that our greatest difficulties as a nation have been
already met
and overcome. The severest trials
through which a movement, such as ours, is forced to wade, are those
which arise
in its inception and in its organization. The
work which we had undertaken to accomplish was in many respects a
novel one. It was not a revolution
against intolerable ills—it was not the casting off of a foreign
tyranny which had
ground us to the dust—it was not even rebellion against the forms of
the
government under which we had lived, that we might substitute for them
other
forms, but it was the withdrawal from an Union, which had given us, in
spite of
its abuse and corrupt administration, a large share of material
prosperity and
social happiness, and which was associated with all our anticipations
of
national greatness. The love of the
Union was deeply ingrained into the hearts of the nation, and into no
part of
it more deeply than our own Southern section. We
were proud of it as that which gave us dignity abroad and advancement
at home. The people considered its
freedom to be the envy of the world, its constitution the “ne plus
ultra” of
political wisdom. Our most prominent
statesmen had held it up before the nation as the bond of our greatness
and as
the hope of the human race. Webster
had consecrated it, in the Northern mind, by that master piece of
eloquence
which, as a rhetorical effort, has not been surpassed in ancient or
modern
times. Clay
had surrounded it with all the charms of his fascinating personal
popularity,
and had identified it, all through the West, with his wide-spread
political
opinions. Jackson had added to the
influence of this idol of the West,
the idea that the Union had been once preserved by him and that, he had
left
its continued preservation as a sacred legacy to his followers. Even Calhoun,
while advocating the doctrines of State sovereignty, had pressed them
most
earnestly as the means whereby alone the Union could be maintained. But above all, Washington-—the
personification of American constitutional
liberty—had committed it, in his dying words, to the people, as the
central idea
around which the future should forever revolve. It
seemed impossible ever to overcome this idea, and yet the question
had become one, in the minds of many, no one knew how many, between the
Union
and a passive subjection to the yoke which had been so skillfully
preparing for
our necks. Again and again had disunion
been attempted and had failed, in some cases, with ignominy, with
hopelessness
in others. The Union was fast absorbing
everything in the popular mind and becoming the devouring idol of the
nation. Before it the constitution had
changed its
whole scope and meaning—before it liberty was fast becoming a mere
word—under its
sanction an irresponsible majority was transferring power, prosperity
and
wealth from one section of the country to the other.
The cry of Union had become a sanction for
every irresponsible decree, a war-cry against all opposition that
promised to
be effectual. The greatest danger of the
South was, lest her people should permit this idea to overlay every
other
consideration and to rise superior to every constitutional infraction. There was no overt act of tyranny to arouse
the
people to madness—no action on the part of the government to render
resistance
immediately necessary—nay, the government had, in a certain way, been
in the
hands of those who were willing to concede to the South her
constitutional rights. It was necessary to
meet the deeply laid and
far-reaching scheme of which we spoke just now, by an equally
far-seeing and
prospective opposition, and the difficulty was lest the people should
not see,
with any degree of unanimity, the necessity for immediate action. All saw that the time was coming—all looked
shudderingly at the prospect of civil convulsion which seemed drawing
nearer
and nearer—but Hope was strong in many of our most devoted Southern
hearts—men
who are now standing with their swords in their hands and their shields
clasped
over the bosom of their mother in the very front rank of battle—that
God might
yet avert the evil and postpone if not defer forever the stern
necessity. Secession was urged more upon
what was before
us in the future, than upon what had actually taken place.
Coming events had, to be sure, cast their
ominous shadows before, but as yet there was no act which had come
directly home
to the cottage and fireside. The raid
into Virginia in 1859, had, at the time, produced a deep sensation, but
as that
Mother of States had treated it lightly herself, having been satisfied
with the
punishment of the wrong-doers, it had died away. Under
these circumstances, the most sanguine
feared the issue of the question between Secession and the Union. They believed that a majority in certain
States would sanction an act of separation, but they dreaded such an
opposition
in each State as might neutralize the action and impair its whole moral
effect. Anything like a nearly equal vote
in the
States would have created a nucleus of opposition which would have
rendered the
whole proceeding inefficient. But, thanks
be to God he gave us among ourselves a more remarkable unanimity than
anyone
had dared to hope for, and what was lacking in ourselves, was supplied
by the
blunders of our adversaries. Instead of
supporting those who were not prepared for separation, by granting
their
moderate demands of constitutional amendment, they struck blow after
blow upon an
already over excited country, with a folly that was inconceivable. Every plank upon which the Union men of the
South
desired to stand, was successively struck from under them, and the
unanimity
which the merits of the question failed to produce, their stubborn
obstinacy
rendered inevitable. Instead of meeting
the advances of the Union men of the South with a lofty magnanimity—a
magnanimity which a victorious party can always afford to exhibit—they
met them
with a. defiant arrogance.
They showed evidently by all their actions
that they considered the struggle as at an end, and that they were
commissioned
to walk as conquerors over a subjugated territory.
One by one, all their friends were driven
from them, and thus has been produced an Union of the South which was
scarcely
hoped for when the struggle first began. And
thanks be to God their folly still continues, and if, with humble
hearts, we bow ourselves before God, and ascribe this important result
not to
ourselves but to His overruling and protecting Providence, we shall see
still
greater wonders worked for us, and new stars rising to take their place
in our
constellation, and nations coming to our aid who were supposed to be
bound to
the North by strong bonds of sympathy and fanaticism.
“Not unto us, Lord, not unto us, but unto thy
name give glory, for thy mercy and for thy truth’s sake.” Another
danger which threatened
us and which is the “experimentum crucis” of all new nationalities, was
the
adoption of the permanent constitution under which we were to live. It is always a moment of critical peril. It was the rock upon which Cromwell's
successful usurpation crumbled to the dust. So
long as he lived, his genius sustained the civil arrangements which
he had substituted for the English constitution, but with his death
things
flowed back into their ancient channel and the nation returned joyfully
to the monarchical
government even of the Stuarts. It was
the rock upon which the European revolutions of 1848 all split. Theorists took up the question of government
and inexperienced professors and fantastic poets were deputed to
arrange
constitutions and to mould the necessities of a practical world. It ended just as any man of common sense might
have foreseen that it would end, in the usurpation of a clear-headed
man of
practical experience. In the formation of
the constitution of 1789, that which we have just amended, there was
large
diversity of opinion, and much time was consumed ere it could be made
satisfactory to the thirteen States. The
leading men of the country were forced to exert all their influence to
secure
its adoption. Washington talked for it— Madison
and Hamilton and Jay wrote for it—the heroes
who had
illustrated the war of the Revolution, prayed for it as the seal to
their bloody
triumph. And yet, with all this array of
influence, it was very reluctantly adopted by several of the States,
and one
distinguished gentleman of South Carolina said, during the debates upon
its
adoption in the Convention of that State, “I desire no other epitaph to
be
written upon my tomb than this: ‘Here lies the man who voted against
the
adoption of the Federal Constitution.’” How wonderful then, that in a
few weeks
a Congress of gentlemen, who had differed all their lives upon
questions of
national policy, who were just warm from heated discussions of
principles as
well as men, who were yet reeking with the sweat of one of the
bitterest
Presidential elections which had ever distracted the country, should
have
submitted to the people of the Confederate States a constitution of the
most
conservative character in which many grave errors of the old
constitution had
been amended and new features introduced of the highest moral and
religious
import. They entered that Congress with
several questions ominous of evil pressing upon them—questions upon
which, if
they had erred, their cause must have been shaken to its centre. Among these were the re-opening of the
African slave trade, the change in the value of slave representation,
and that
question which had once before disturbed the Union, the proper scale of
duties
upon imports and exports. A false step
upon any one of these three questions would have been, in our then
condition,
almost irretrievable. The reopening of
the African slave trade would have disgusted Europe and produced great
dissatisfaction at home. A change in the
value of slave representation would have disaffected that large
population of
our mountains and pine barrens who own no slaves, and would have thrown
them at
once into the hands of demagogues. Too
high a tariff would have checked the sympathy of England and France,
and too
low a tariff would have forced us to resort to direct taxation, which a
people must
be educated to bear. Marvelous then was
it in our eyes that these gentlemen should have laid upon the altar of
their
country all their private views and all their public differences, and
should
have adjusted every point with such nice discrimination, with such wise
and Christian
moderation, with such a happy conception of the necessities which
surrounded
their States, that an almost unanimous shout of applause should have
arisen
from a delighted constituency. And
afterwards, that seven conventions, composed in a like manner of men of
every
shade of opinion and of every party in politics, should have so quietly
and so
unanimously accepted their work, can be attributed to nothing else but
the overruling
spirit of God. All these bodies entered
upon their duties with fasting and prayer—they all acknowledged God
every day
in prayer—they placed him in the forefront of their constitution, and
they
recognized him as the supreme ruler of the universe, and we therefore
can truly
say again “Not unto us, Lord, not unto us, but unto thy name give
glory, for
thy mercy and for thy truth’s sake.” The next trial, through which
the
Confederate States were called upon to pass, arose out of the
regulation of its
financial affairs. Napoleon is reported
to have said, blasphemously enough, that battles were decided by the
heaviest
artillery, and the world is fast coming to the conclusion that the
longest
purse is the arbiter of war. Granting
this to be in some measure true, we yet acknowledge most humbly the
presence of
God with our Government in this most important matter. The most
arrogant boast of the North was of its
own abounding wealth and of our exceeding poverty, and so long had this
assertion been made and so persistently had it been adhered to, that
both sides
were fast becoming to believe it. The
North and the South were both losing sight of the unalterable
principles of
political economy and had become confused amid the complications of
commerce
and trade and exchange. In a conflict
like this, wealth must be looked at from a different stand point from
that in
which it is viewed in a time of peace. At
its commencement, the North has most accumulated money, because its
great
cities have been the converging centres from all parts of this widely
extended
country, but accumulated money is very soon expended in a war like
this, and
the ability to continue it will depend far more upon the available
income of
each section than upon its money capital at the outset. The
wealth of the North depends upon
manufactures, upon trade, upon commerce, and the North West furnishes a
very
abundant supply of food. Analyze this
wealth and you will perceive that its results depend upon the ability
to find consumers
and to furnish an exchangeable value upon which to trade. Unless
manufactures find a market, they
remain a drug upon the hands of the manufacturers and are a loss
instead of a
gain. Unless trade finds purchasers as
well as sellers, it very soon becomes bankrupt in the face of rents and
living
and the taxation of a war such as this will be, if it goes on.
Unless commerce has something to export as well
as to import, it must necessarily come to an end, for one cannot buy,
as the
world goes on now, unless he has something to sell. The North has
no great export of its own which
is a necessity to the world. Now and
then the failure of a grain crop in England or upon the Continent,
creates a demand
for corn, and then, for a season, the West can furnish a value that is
exchangeable. But this is an exceptional
case, and the commercial men of the North have never placed any
permanent
dependence upon it. It has rested its exchanges
upon the cotton and tobacco of the South, and it has obtained
possession of
these by flooding our States with its manufactures and nicnacs of every
description, and by acting as the commercial broker of the South.
And besides selling our valuable staple for
trifles like these, which we could as well make for ourselves, we have
annually
distributed much that remained of these staples upon hotels and
watering
places, in steamboats and railroads, in shops of luxury and temples of
fashion
and upon what is facetiously called education and accomplishments.
And by the time that the cotton and the
tobacco were made, it no more belonged to us than did the manufactures
of
England, and we were compelled in common honesty to let it go where it
was
really owned. At a very moderate calculation,
the exchangeable value thus furnished the North in return for its
manufactures and
its climate and its fashion, amounted annually to between one and two
hundred
millions of dollars. But all this is now
changed; we have seen the last of it, at least during the war, and a
year or
two will soon show that the subtraction of this amount from the one
side, and
the addition of it to the other, will make a marvelous difference in
the
aggregate of wealth. And while the
withholding of this immense sum of money from the North will cripple
its
resources, it will be put in circulation among ourselves and add to the
income and
resources of our own citizens. For there
is no truer principle in political economy than this, that the
distribution of
money has as much to do with the wealth of a country as its
production.
God seems to have endowed our financial officers
with the wisdom to seize the strong point of our economical position
and our
people with the patriotism to receive and adopt it. They have
made our great staple to supply for
them the place which gold and silver supply for the Banks. As
they issue paper money upon the coin which
they possess, so will the Confederate States issue paper upon the
cotton which
it will accumulate by the exchange for it of Confederate bonds, and
thus,
instead of a currency depreciating continually like the old continental
money,
we shall have a currency always at par, because the cotton which is its
basis,
is always wanted and receives no injury of any material consequence
from being
piled up during a blockade. If a
currency keeps at par, and it will always keep at par when it is known
to
represent an actual value, nobody will care to have it redeemed,
especially so
long as he may be hemmed in from intercourse with any except those
whose currency
it is. And besides furnishing a Bank
capital for the Confederate States, it becomes in the hands of the
government an
instrument of great power for the regulation and control of foreign
alliances. Refusing to permit its export except through
our own seaports, it will soon bring all the nations who use our
cotton, face
to face, with the question between us and our enemies. It is not
that cotton is King, but that God
has given our statesmen wisdom to use a great advantage aright, and the
people
self-denial to acquiesce in the arrangement, and to stand manfully by
it. “Not unto us, Lord, not unto us, but unto thy
name give glory, for thy mercy and for thy truth's sake.” And
in this very matter our God
does seem to have smitten our enemies with judicial blindness. Just when they most needed sound wisdom, they
have inaugurated a financial system which must cripple their resources. A prohibitory tariff, and one which they will
find it difficult to repeal, because it was given as a sop to
particular
States, just when a nation needs both friends and money, is the very
height of
folly, and a system of borrowing, at a heavy discount, is a poor
beginning for
a people boasting of its wealth and arrogant about its resources. The commercial men of the North perceive this
weakness and therefore it is that they cry out for quick measures and a
short
war. They know that they cannot bear a
long one, and very soon will they begin to murmur at any
Commander-in-chief who
desires to move slowly and surely, and will either hurry him into
measures which
will ensure his defeat or force him to yield his marshal's baton into
bolder
because more ignorant hands. Truly does
God
seem to have ordered everything for us and to have made everything work
for the
security of our cause. How can anyone
distrust him or be faithless enough to ask with our enemies, “Where is
now
their God?” If
we turn from the financial to
the military affairs of the Confederate States, we perceive the same
visible
presence of God in our concerns. In the
beginning of this movement we appeared to have no resources wherewith
to meet
the immense preponderance of power that was against us.
They had armies, navies, armories,
manufactories, everything that could conduce to their
strength—fortresses
bristled in our midst and aimed their guns against the people they had
been builded
to protect—a large, well ordered army, stood upon our Texan frontier
quite in a
condition to have invaded and embarrassed us—a large armament was
fitted out to
strike at the heart of South Carolina, which was considered the soul of
the
rebellion—a navy yard of immense resources, filled with arms and
ammunition and
ordnance, supported by the strongest fortress in the Union and defended
by men
of war armed with guns of the heaviest calibre, lay upon our North
eastern
frontier. A hastily raised militia was
all we had to depend upon in the conflict. But
in a moment everything seemed changed in a
way more than natural. Skillful officers
sprang from every direction into the arena. Armed
men arose as if from the dragons teeth which the abolitionists had
been sowing for years. And fear seemed
to fall upon our enemies—unaccountable fear. Officers
who had never quailed before any living man—soldiers who had
borne the old flag to victory wherever it had waved over them—navies
which had
moved defiant over the world, all, all seemed paralyzed.
That large border army surrendered to militia
without a blow—that gallant armament, made up of the same fleet which
had run
in the revolution into the Thames, which had defied the Algerine
batteries,
which had brought Austria to terms in the Levant, which had spit its
fire into
the face of the almost impregnable fortress of St. Juan d'Ulloa stood
inert and
saw a gallant soldier, who was upholding their own flag, beaten out of
his
fortress by sand batteries and volunteers. That
immense navy yard, with its vast resources, with its great power of
resistance, with its huge fortress at its back? with its magnificent
men-of-war
all armed and shotted, was deserted in an unaccountable panic because
of the
threats of a few almost unarmed citizens and the rolling during the
night of
well managed locomotives. And nowhere
could this panic have occurred more seasonably for us, because it gave
us just
what we most needed, arms and ammunition and heavy ordnance in great
abundance. All this is unaccountable upon
any ordinary
grounds. But two days before a naval
officer of very high rank had reported to headquarters at Washington
that this
navy yard was impregnable. Is not this
very like the noise of chariots and the noise of horses, even the noise
of a
great host which the Syrians were made to hear when the Lord would
deliver
Israel? “And they said one to another,
Lo, the King of Israel hath hired against us the King of the Hittites
and the
Kings of the Egyptians, to come upon us. Wherefore
they arose and fled in the twilight and left their tents and
their horses and their asses, even the camp as it was, and fled for
their life.” “Not
unto us, Lord, not unto us, but unto thy name give glory, for thy mercy
and for
thy truth's sake.” And
now, my beloved people, after
such tokens of God’s presence with us in all the departments of our
civil
affairs, need we be afraid of man’s revilings, and man's threats? If God be with us, who can be against us?
Shimei’s cursings did not hurt David; they only returned upon his own
head. And if any be presumptuous enough,
in the arrogance
of their wealth and in the pride of their numbers, and in the
presumption of
their Pharisaism to ask “Where is now their God?” we can humbly answer
“Our God
is in the Heavens: he hath done whatsoever he pleased.” Nay,
more, we can tremblingly rejoice and
point to His presence with us upon earth. He
is too manifestly with our people, giving them unanimity and
patriotism—with our rulers, giving them wisdom and moderation and a
proper
sense of their dependance upon him—with our armies, shielding them in
the hour
of conflict, for us not to acknowledge it. We
should be as brute beasts before him if we did not perceive his
presence and humble ourselves before him. God
loves to be honored in the assemblies of the Saints, and he delights
in the praises and thanksgivings of his people. There
is no surer mode of driving Him from us than by refusing to
acknowledge His presence among us. It is
not humility to be blind to the tokens of God's goodness towards us, it
is
faithlessness—it is not vain boasting to enumerate his glorious acts in
our
behalf, it is giving Him the honor due unto His holy name.
Read the Psalms of David and note how
frequently he enumerates in long and elaborate verse the wondrous acts
of the
Lord, closing each stanza with the triumphant refrain, “For ins mercy
endureth
forever.” And surely he knew how God loved
to be praised. Let us not be afraid or
ashamed to see the hand of the Lord in everything, to believe firmly
that He
does manifest himself for the right, and to be a praying and a
thanksgiving
people, as well as a fighting people. “Some
trust in horses and chariots, but we will trust in the Lord our God.” But
while we render thanks unto
the Lord for all His benefits towards us, how deeply should their
reception
humble us! For we have been utterly
undeserving of them. They are the tokens
of unmerited mercy. If God was only strict
to mark iniquity, which of us could stand? As
a people, how little have we done for his
cause! how poorly have we fulfilled the
great mission entrusted to our hands! What
wretched stewards have we been of the
treasures committed to our keeping! How
polluted our land has been with profaneness, with blasphemy, with
Sabbath
breaking, with the shedding of blood. What
violence and recklessness, what extravagance
and waste have manifested themselves as the normal condition of our
people!
what an idolatry to fashion has disfigured the ancient simplicity of
our people! What a high value has been put
among us
upon all those qualities which are the very opposites of the graces of
the
gospel, upon pride, upon self-reliance, upon animal courage! How inordinately has wealth been sought after
and valued! How honor, falsely so
called, has been exalted and almost deified! And
if with all these hateful sins cleaving to
our national skirts, God can yet manifest His presence with us, what
might we
not hope for, if we would lay down those iniquities at the foot of
Jesus’ Cross
and cry for mercy? Let us begin to-day
and with deep humility of spirit, confess our unworthiness and pray the
Lord
that He will not turn His face from us, but will still enable us to
say, “Our
Lord is in the heavens.” We are engaged, my
people, in one
of the grandest struggles which ever nerved the hearts or strengthened
the
hands of a heroic race. We are fighting
for great principles, for sacred objects—principles which must not be
compromised; objects which must not be abandoned. We
are fighting to prevent ourselves from
being transferred from American republicanism to French democracy. We are fighting to rescue the fair name of
our social life from the dishonor which has been cast upon it. We are fighting to protect and preserve a
race who form a part of our household, and stand with us next to our
children. We are fighting to drive away
from our
sanctuaries the infidel and rationalistic principles which are sweeping
over
the land and substituting a gospel of the stars and stripes for the
gospel of
Jesus Christ. These objects are far more
important even than liberty, for they concern the inner life, the soul
and
eternity. Let us be strong and quit
ourselves
as men—strong in the strength of Jesus, strong in the presence of the
Lord of
Hosts. Let us, in all our efforts, in
all our successes, say unceasingly “Not
unto us, not unto us, Lord, be the glory.” Let
us in all our reverses still praise the
Lord and in all humility reply “Our God is in the Heavens: He hath done
whatsoever he pleased.” |
Back to Causes of the Civil War (Main page) Back to Sermons and Other Religious Tracts Source: Document found on the Internet Archive; see also, Gospel of Disunion, by Mitchell Snay. Date added to website: April 25, 2024 Back to the top of the page. |